Mark+Rubric

=Energy Conversions and Technology Project Mark Rubric:= The following rubric can be used to determine how your project will be graded. If you have any questions regarding this rubric, please ask me for clarification.

(5) ||= Good Work (4) ||= Getting There (3) ||= Not Quite (2) ||= Not Even Close (1) || is tapped by the technology (15) ||< conversions listed in appropriate order with detailed explanation that is easily understood ||< **most conversions mentioned approximate order with understandable explanation** ||< major conversions mentioned with limited explanation ||< few conversions make sense and explanation lacking ||< conversions not formalized, explanation difficult to follow || posed by use of this technology (10) ||< a number of significant issues are described and adequately examined ||< **a few issues are described and adequately examined** ||< limited issues are described and examination is cursory ||< one issue is described with no examination ||< issue is identified with not description or examination || of this type of technology (5) ||< cost effectiveness researched from credible sources (govt. agencies) and other sources (private sites), examples identified ||< **cost effectiveness researched from any source, examples limited** ||< cost effectiveness discussed but research not apparent or limited sources used ||< cost effectiveness mentioned but not researched adequately ||< no mention of cost effectiveness ||
 * = Presentation Parts ||= Excellent
 * < Explanation of how the source of energy
 * < Media representation of the process (10) ||< media examples accurately describe the conversion processes involved, and is easy to follow ||< media example(s) accurately describes the conversion processes involved ||< **media example does not directly demonstrate process, but process can be inferred** ||< media example(s) are not useful to understanding the energy conversion. ||< no media examples included ||
 * < Advantages and disadvantages (limitations)
 * < Present thought around cost effectiveness
 * < Group participation (10) ||< **evidence of purposeful contribution to project as listed in discussion and/or editing of group page** ||< evidence of contribution to project as listed in discussion and/or editing of group page ||< contribution to project limited as listed in evidence ||< contribution almost non-existent in development of project ||< no involvement in project ||
 * References (5) ||= a number of references adequately identified || **a few references adequately identified, others just identified** || references identified but not appropriately || only one or two references used and identified but not appropriately || references not identified ||